Catalog listing Microsoft Learn module

Train and evaluate regression models: Review

Named reviewer score 3.8 / 5
  • Teaching 4.0
  • Hands-on 3.5
  • Freshness 4.5
  • Value 4.0
  • Career fit 3.0

Provider: Microsoft Learn Format: Microsoft Learn module with interactive sandbox Time: 1 hour, as advertised Price: The module itself is free. Watch for costs if you decide to pursue a related Azure certification exam. — Check current pricing on the official site.

This catalog page is listed from an official provider feed. It is not independently verified for search indexing yet.

Visit the official course

Reviewer's verdict

A solid, one-hour primer for non-technical folks to finally see what their data science colleagues are doing. It's less a 'how-to' and more a 'what-is'.

Decision summary

3.8/5 Last verified: August 31, 2026

Best for

PMs and business analysts who need to understand what 'training a model' actually means in concrete steps.

Watch for

The exercises are very guided; it's more of a demonstration than a true coding challenge.

  • Teaching 4.0
  • Hands-on 3.5
  • Freshness 4.5
  • Value 4.0
  • Career fit 3.0

Who it's for

PMs and business analysts who need to understand what 'training a model' actually means in concrete steps.

Who should skip it

Aspiring data scientists or engineers looking for a deep dive into regression theory or coding.

Pros

  • Clearly explains the 'what' and 'why' of regression without getting lost in math.
  • The interactive Azure ML sandbox is excellent for seeing the process live.
  • Connects technical steps (like logging metrics with MLflow) back to business goals (like picking the best model).

Cons

  • The exercises are very guided; it's more of a demonstration than a true coding challenge.
  • Jumps between simple and 'powerful' models without much intuition on when to use which.
  • Feels like a gateway to selling Azure services.

Running the second exercise, the one for training more 'powerful' models, is where this clicked. It has you run a Lasso model and then a Gradient Boosting Regressor. You just hit 'run' on mostly provided code. I'd usually complain, but it worked here. I could ignore the Python syntax and focus on the *result*. The R-squared value changed. The RMSE metric dropped. 'Model improvement' suddenly wasn't an abstract concept, but a concrete number on my screen tied to a specific action.

That's the real point of this module for someone in my role. It’s a guided tour, not a data science bootcamp in an hour. Now I have a mental model for what my team means when they say they're 'tuning hyperparameters' or 'evaluating different algorithms'. It's this: they run experiments, check the metrics, and pick the winner. The bit about using MLflow to log the runs was useful; I get it now, it's a digital lab notebook to keep track of experiments so you don't lose the best result.

An engineer would probably find this whole thing insultingly simple. But as a PM who needs to have intelligent conversations about model performance without getting bogged down in matrix algebra, it was a surprisingly productive lunch break.

Last verified: August 31, 2026. We re-check course details periodically — see our methodology. Pricing and availability can change; always confirm on the official site.

Community reviews

No community reviews yet — be the first to share your experience.

Reader-submitted experiences, separate from the named reviewer score above.

Not sure which course fits you?

Answer a few questions about your goals, experience, time, and budget — get a personalized shortlist in about three minutes.